Fix Computer Daemon Story

Demon is slang for early personal computers. In early Daemon Story labs, daemons meant programs ran in the background and did the invisible work of keeping systems running. The word comes from Maxwell’s “Demon”, a 19th-century thought experiment that imagined an unnatural being with the ability to bring order to the world; This inspired generations of scientists to try cooking real devils.

Internet Demons: Digital Communications Owned received the 2019 Gertrude J. Robinson Book Award from the Canadian Communications Association.
University of Minnesota Press

My open-access book, Demons: Internet Owned Digital Communications, deals with the demons that communicate with the Internet. But demons and other computer software do much more than just dump information. Here I want to combine my close attention to the demons of the world with broader ways of providing computing power and optimizing life today.

Demons are needed to understand modern concerns about original city projects like Google’s Sidewalk Labs in Toronto and recent attention so they can keep an eye on capitalism. To solve these newly releasedLet’s algorithmically understand the long history of internet demons and the resulting policy issues.

Demonic Intelligence

The Internet was born during the Cold War. Researchers at the US Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) included computers in their design for an experimental digital interconnect system. Known as the ARPANET, its design evolved into the modern Internet. And these computers, known as Message Interface Processors (IMPs), became the switches, routers, and gateways that make up the core infrastructure of the Internet today.

In integrating computers into commercial applications, the ARPANET has hired demons to better manage our communications. The demons were a functional hive mind that is currently spreading across the ARPANET and is in constant contact with each other and with the first users. Collective personal intelligence has streamlined the flow of concepts in the ARPANET.

ARPANET installed daemons that could better manage communications and, in addition, the optimal network was created automatically by their coordination. As the ARPANET became our Internet, these theoretical issues became public issues left to ISPs.

Computer Networks: Forerunners of Resource Sharing is a 1972 working documentary on the ARPANET.

The old questions about how best for daemons to process our messages have become the main arguments regarding net neutrality and the likelihood of interoperability between service providers. Service providers may decide to sell business partnerships as streaming services also downgrade peer-to-peer networks such as BitTorrent.

5G, the term for next-generation wireless services, will raise these questions again. 5G requires much more demonic intelligence to handle the complexities of sending signals wirelessly and allows service providers to prioritize signals, but someApps work better than others. This is a problem because decision makers in the city today have little understanding of the aspirations of the demons, and there will certainly be a lack of proper oversight of the specific next generation demons required for 5G.

But the problem with optimization isn’t just that you’re having connectivity issues.

Managing Through Optimization

Internet daemons improve the way in which computer systems are actively managed according to specific goals or best-performing states. Optimization is another way to understand algorithmic control. It is both a credible way of thinking and a workable solution. Optimization consists in computing optimal states that solve individual and political problems. Optimization also makes it possible to achieve these states. Daemons are just one type of optimization that has evolved into a compute profile.

The technical overtones of the update obscure its social and political significance. Examples of the optimal amount of news to includeFacebook newsfeed or reducing wait times for Uber customers include tech and employment solutions.

By understanding the specific demons associated with work, we can begin to determine how ubiquitous optimization is today.
Shutterstock

Pandemonium Banished

What is a daemon?

“Demon” is actually a very old form of the word “demon”; Demons do not need to have a particular affinity for good or evil, but rather serve to define the character or personality of a race.

Demonic optimization has become a model for digital platforms. Daemons (and other such programs) are ubiquitous today. Embedded in our screens, apps and smartphones in the marketplace, their nudges, rankings and interventions drive our behavior and social activities.Activities in your free time.

Optimization goes beyond marketing communications and is applicable to solving social problems. Google admitted in 2016 in an internal mind game called Selfish That Ledger that it speculates on how global problems – like health or climate change – can be solved using mobile phones and other connected devices focused on monitoring and optimizing human activities. .

I’ve been envisioning Google ever since as a complete global operating system, a distributed learning system capable of guiding people to specific places with clues and other clues on our phones and other smartphones. The binding, arbitration, normalization, protection, and management of these information flows depend on the daemons. We

Now Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Tencent and, to a lesser extent, Facebook are clearly caught in between competing operating systems. Performance optimization is too good to be left to a few companies personally. user

In design, dark patterns are denoted withties that cause people to make bad decisions. We see dark patterns that you need to see: like when we accidentally click on a useful popup ad because it looks like a window on our laptop, or we can’t uninstall an app because the “close window” option is activated. hidden. The same software can be optimized to fight addiction, anxiety and confusion.

In Essence, Optimization Is Nothing More Than Politics

The paradox is that the improvement of control tools does not mean that technologies should be controlled in any meaningful way. Instead, the functioning of systems seems to be going out of fashion for the average person, who is increasingly in control.

Continue reading:
It’s time to find a new way to regulate the Internet 2 . 0 media platforms

Comments are closed.

Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.